Are they trying to get blocked?(see comments)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Links, green politics, puzzles, and Snapple-y goodness
Friends (with blogs)
Posts
Blinks
Blabels
- academia (1)
- badvertising (3)
- consumerism (7)
- corporations (12)
- daily show (6)
- dream (1)
- environment (17)
- games (2)
- idea (6)
- interweb (12)
- link (13)
- photography (3)
- politics (5)
- privacy (4)
- puzzles (1)
- quotes (1)
- software (7)
- tech (15)
- travel (2)
- unnecessary (11)
- visualization (1)
(Rather little) About Me
Do you actually read this blog?
Probably necessary legal disclaimer
This blog-thing has zero to do with Snapple, its parent company, their parent company, their parent's parent company, etc. It's just a silly name and I like Snapple. Please don't sue me. Any opinions in this blog are my own and not my employer.
3 comments:
I assumed that was another system mangling the subject line (and probably adding some headers too). Lately I've been getting a lot of spam where I'm on the return-to-sender line, i.e. the spam was sent to someone else, their mail server rejected it, and then it bounced back to me.
Yeah, I looked deeper at the headers and it seems that some intermediate server kindly added the spam marker (though still allowed it to pass through?). I also get tons of mailer-daemon ones too.
the is are two great names for that phenomena: backscatter email, or collateral spam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_%28e-mail%29
Post a Comment